A Determination of KIP Kuliah Scholarship Recipients Using the AHP and TOPSIS Method (Case Study: UMKT Student Division)

Authors

  • ARIF RAHMAN HAKIM UNIVERITAS MUHAMMADIYAH KALIMANTAN TIMUR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34818/INDOJC.2023.8.1.694

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Scholarship KIP Kuliah

Abstract

Student Division Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur manage various scholarship for student,one of them is Kartu Indonesia Pintar Kuliah scholarship, the process include is where UMKT Student Division need to estimate eligible student receiving scholarship based on 4 criteria, the problem may occur is to many scholarship applicant but scholarship quota is limited it’s hard to choose eligible scholarship recipient among student applicant. By using AHP and TOPSIS to determine KIP Kuliah Scholarship Recipients, AHP used to given weight to all criteria, DTKS (0.539), Family Condition (0.086), Family economy (0.093), House Condition (0.282) and topsis used to process all student applicant year 2022 or alternatives, by using ahp and topsis to determine scholarship recipients the model gain 77% accuracy rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Marfuah and S. Widiantoro, “The Implementation of Analytical Hierarchy Process Method for Outstanding Achievement Scholarship Reception Selection at Universal University of Batam,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 97, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/97/1/012003.
[2] A. S. Meriani Catur Utami, Yuni Sugiarti, Ahmad Melani, Yusuf Durachman, “Implementation of TOPSIS method in the selection process of scholarship grantee (case study: BAZIS South Jakarta),” 2017 5th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag., 2017, doi: 10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089277.
[3] A. K. Wardana, “AHP-TOPSIS PADA SELEKSI PENERIMAAN BANTUAN PROGRAM INDONESIA PINTAR,” J. Masy. Inform. Indones., vol. 4, no. April, pp. 49–58, 2019.
[4] P. Hasan, E. Utami, S. Yunita, E. Pawan, and Kaharuddin, “Selection of scholarship acceptance using AHP and TOPSIS methods,” 2019 Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. ICOIACT 2019, pp. 920–925, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICOIACT46704.2019.8938533.
[5] N. Özeyranlı Ergenç and Barış, “Prioritization of hazard profile for Istanbul using Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 325–336, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-3041-x.
[6] J. J. Jara et al., “Ranking of Placer Gold Prospects in Chile Through Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Nat. Resour. Res., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 813–832, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11053-018-9420-5.
[7] W. Dong, J. Fu, Z. Jie, and J. Wang, “Study on Operation Evaluation of Charging and Discharging Network Based on Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation,” Proc. 2018 2nd IEEE Adv. Inf. Manag. Commun. Electron. Autom. Control Conf. IMCEC 2018, no. Imcec, pp. 1991–1995, 2018, doi: 10.1109/IMCEC.2018.8469406.
[8] A. Hajjah and D. Oktarina, “Decision Support System To Recommend Scholarships Using AHP TOPSIS Methods In Education And Culture Office Of Pekanbaru,” Am. J. Eng. Res. (AJER, no. 7, pp. 61–67, 2018.
[9] Y. S. Bagi, S. Suyono, and M. F. Tomatala, “Decision Support System for High Achieving Students Selection Using AHP and TOPSIS,” Oct. 2020. doi: 10.1109/ICORIS50180.2020.9320823.
[10] A. D. Setiawan, A. Hidayatno, B. D. Putra, and I. Rahman, “Selection of Charging Station Technology to Support the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Indonesia with the AHP-TOPSIS Method,” 2020 3rd Int. Conf. Power Energy Appl. ICPEA 2020, pp. 85–88, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICPEA49807.2020.9280125.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30

How to Cite

ARIF RAHMAN HAKIM. (2023). A Determination of KIP Kuliah Scholarship Recipients Using the AHP and TOPSIS Method (Case Study: UMKT Student Division). Indonesian Journal on Computing (Indo-JC), 8(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.34818/INDOJC.2023.8.1.694

Issue

Section

Information System